How should the USA deal with China should they contain or not contain Research Paper

How should the USA deal with china contende should they kibosh or not contain China - Research Paper ExampleThis year featured spats amidst China versus Philippines China versus Vietnam and China versus Japan. The disagreements are loudly triggering diplomatic tensions as Chinese government commove forth their marine vessels in shores that are within the territorial jurisdictions of other Southeast Asian countries. The topographic point alarmed the international community, especi completelyy fall in States of America, because this Chinese territorial aggression also strategically affects its geographical control in the Pacific regions and with allied countries. This brought us the core issue, must US contain China or not? What is Containment? Before variegated positions are explicated, let us define first what containment all about is. Containment is a foreign constitution strategy of the United States at the height of cold war which was prominently used by George F. Kennan i n 1947 against communist nation to isolate and marginalize it to lessen it curve or remove its political clout from allied countries.1 Experts posit, by experience, that the containment theory of US resulted to the intervention of United States in Vietnam, Central America and in Grenada.2 This was also adopted by US President Truman as part of the Truman doctrine and is also widely discussed in US and Iraq conflict.3 Containment is historically started in a immense telegraph sent by George Kennan from Moscow to Washington in 1946 about the Soviets refusal to jointure the International Monetary Bank and World Bank which detailed the practices of the country and anent recommendation to use the policy of containmentwhich ultimately led to that historic Cold War.4 From a psychological vantage, containment is a control theory aiming at establishing internal and external factors to develop a law-abiding behaviour which could be considered as a defensive structure or a protective insul ation against potential conflict or delinquency.5 Shouldnt Contain rough political analysts argued that US shouldnt contain China albeit the reactions of other countries who presumed that US intervention will financial aid balance the power amid incessant aggression of Chinese soldiers to Hanoi, Philippines and Japan. Chinese however demanded from US, which was sought for intervention by aggrieved parties to refrain from getting involved asserting that the conflicting parties can resolve maritime and territorial disputes by bilateral consultations.6 This call generated political mass actions by peoples who rallied in the streets and in Chinese embassies or yet conducted live-fire drills (e.g. Vietnam) to demonstrate their disagreement with Chinas two-face diplomatic strategy in relating with them offering a pop off for bilateral consultations but at the same time, aggressively sending marine soldiers within sovereign states shores to strike ownership or prior rights thereof.7 Affected countries wanted to internationalize the issue while Chinese irrelevant this effort to bring the international community to multilateral discourse on this problem arguing