Land Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 words

Land Law - Essay ExampleThe estate overwhelms a gothic house and a ghost fit ride which Lee constructed after acquiring the belongings. The unhappily dilapidated and over grown ghost train track was lined with suitably frightening objects including cardinal dozen ghoulish stone statutes some of which father f bothen to the ground. Notwithstanding the sad state of the property, you mentioned that you vaporize in love with the train ride and bowed to restore it when you first looked around the property preceding to the purchase agreement. And, as soon as you became the registered proprietor of Headlong Hall estate and after the fulfilment date you immediately moved in. You were horrified to find start that Lee took the statutes with him after you have establish prohibited that the statute were the 1967 creation of Bridget Hepworth before she become a famous sculpture and is worth some(prenominal) hundred thousand pounds. After a week in the property you were surprised to f ind out that Ms Ingrid Cave is occupying the west wing of the Headlong Hall that Mister Peter Lee converted into a separate four-bedroom dwelling. Ms Ingrid Cave claims that Mister Peter Lee has held the West Wing for her in 2004 when she fell on hard times scarcely the agreement was never registered by either of them. She further claimed that her c areer have taken a turn for the better and she spend most of her time in Mexico where she rents her own categorical to explain her 12 month long absence and her irregular presence in Headlong Hall. With regards to the withdraw Bridget Hepworth carved statutes I am afraid that Lee is well within his legal rights to remove all movable objects that are not considered permanent fixtures of the property. From your narration, Lee was able to bring the statutes with him when he moved out this indicates that no extra effort can be exerted to remove the statute thus it is considered movable. There was no mention that the purchase price include s the disposition of the statutes even if you mentioned that you fell in love with the ghoulish train ride when you first saw it. The absence of this particular item in your agreement with Lee clearly indicates that all movable objects of the property being bought are not part of the property purchased. At this juncture, I would like to make a distinction between two kinds of propertiesreal and personal. Real properties refer to lands which include everything attached to it permanently while personal properties are movable properties which are objects other than lands that can be the subject of ownership, examples of which are stocks, money, notes, patents, and copyrights. Let us apply the classification into your situation, the statues were incorporated in the land but it was not permanently affixed to the ground. Thus, by its very nature, it remained a personal property. The rails, on the other hand, are permanent in character so it became part of the estate. Having dispensed wit h the classification of properties, let us turn up the intention of Lee in his act of installing the statues. It is beyond dispute that it was Mister Peter Lee who pay for the construction and installation of the ghoulish train tracks including the setting up of the statutes. This indicates that it was not part of the original property when he acquired it. This indicates t